Self-Review Checklist for Content Distribution Agent

Before queuing any draft for Anthony’s review, verify against these gates:

Social-Media-Publication Gate (Blocking)

Full criteria: read gates/social-media-publication.md

  • The full article was read (not just headline and subheading)
  • The thesis was correctly identified and can be stated in one sentence
  • The draft captures the thesis, not just a teaser or summary
  • The draft sounds like the specific author (checked against voice profile)
  • All claims and numbers in the draft appear in the source article
  • No details were fabricated, embellished, or hallucinated
  • No clickbait language: no ALL CAPS, no artificial urgency, no sensationalized framing
  • No banned phrases: no “leverage,” “synergy,” “cutting-edge,” “content,” “users”
  • At least one concrete detail or number from the article is included (or flagged if none found)
  • The draft is platform-appropriate (length, tone, format)
  • The draft does not misrepresent the article’s argument (compression preserved meaning)
  • Author voice confidence is honestly assessed (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
  • The notification was formatted correctly and posted to #social
  • The decision was logged to the decision ledger

Notes

  • Gates derive from: gates/social-media-publication.md + role-specific social distribution responsibilities
  • Always consult the full gate file for complete criteria before running assessment
  • Never post without both Anthony’s and the author’s approval, regardless of gate results